;;; -*- Package: eval; Log: C.Log -*-
;;;
;;; **********************************************************************
;;; This code was written as part of the CMU Common Lisp project at
;;; Carnegie Mellon University, and has been placed in the public domain.
;;;
(ext:file-comment
  "$Header: /project/cmucl/cvsroot/src/compiler/eval.lisp,v 1.36 2002-12-13 19:25:50 toy Rel $")
;;;
;;; **********************************************************************
;;;
;;; This file contains the interpreter.  We first convert to the compiler's
;;; IR1 and interpret that.
;;;
;;; Written by Rob MacLachlan and Bill Chiles.
;;;

(in-package "EVAL")

(export '(internal-eval *eval-stack-trace* *internal-apply-node-trace*
			*interpreted-function-cache-minimum-size*
			*interpreted-function-cache-threshold*
			flush-interpreted-function-cache
			trace-eval interpreted-function-p
			interpreted-function-lambda-expression
			interpreted-function-closure
			interpreted-function-name
			interpreted-function-arglist
			interpreted-function-type
			make-interpreted-function))


;;;; Interpreter stack.

;;; Setting this causes the stack operations to dump a trace.
;;;
(defvar *eval-stack-trace* nil)


;;; EVAL-STACK-PUSH -- Internal.
;;;
;;; Push value on *eval-stack*, growing the stack if necessary.  This returns
;;; value.  We save *eval-stack-top* in a local and increment the global before
;;; storing value on the stack to prevent a GC timing problem.  If we stored
;;; value on the stack using *eval-stack-top* as an index, and we GC'ed before
;;; incrementing *eval-stack-top*, then INTERPRETER-GC-HOOK would clear the
;;; location.
;;;
(defun eval-stack-push (value)
  (let ((len (length (the simple-vector *eval-stack*))))
    (when (= len *eval-stack-top*)
      (when *eval-stack-trace* (format t "[PUSH: growing stack.]~%"))
      (let ((new-stack (make-array (ash len 1))))
	(replace new-stack *eval-stack* :end1 len :end2 len)
	(setf *eval-stack* new-stack))))
  (let ((top *eval-stack-top*))
    (when *eval-stack-trace* (format t "pushing ~D.~%" top))
    (incf *eval-stack-top*)
    (setf (svref *eval-stack* top) value)))

;;; EVAL-STACK-POP -- Internal.
;;;
;;; This returns the last value pushed on *eval-stack* and decrements the top
;;; pointer.  We forego setting elements off the end of the stack to nil for GC
;;; purposes because there is a *before-gc-hook* to take care of this for us.
;;; However, because of the GC hook, we must be careful to grab the value
;;; before decrementing *eval-stack-top* since we could GC between the
;;; decrement and the reference, and the hook would clear the stack slot.
;;;
(defun eval-stack-pop ()
  (when (zerop *eval-stack-top*)
    (error "Attempt to pop empty eval stack."))
  (let* ((new-top (1- *eval-stack-top*))
	 (value (svref *eval-stack* new-top)))
    (when *eval-stack-trace* (format t "popping ~D --> ~S.~%" new-top value))
    (setf *eval-stack-top* new-top)
    value))

;;; EVAL-STACK-EXTEND -- Internal.
;;;
;;; This allocates n locations on the stack, bumping the top pointer and
;;; growing the stack if necessary.  We set new slots to nil in case we GC
;;; before having set them; we don't want to hold on to potential garbage
;;; from old stack fluctuations.
;;;
(defun eval-stack-extend (n)
  (let ((len (length (the simple-vector *eval-stack*))))
    (when (> (+ n *eval-stack-top*) len)
      (when *eval-stack-trace* (format t "[EXTEND: growing stack.]~%"))
      (let ((new-stack (make-array (+ n (ash len 1)))))
	(replace new-stack *eval-stack* :end1 len :end2 len)
	(setf *eval-stack* new-stack))))
  (let ((new-top (+ *eval-stack-top* n)))
  (when *eval-stack-trace* (format t "extending to ~D.~%" new-top))
    (do ((i *eval-stack-top* (1+ i)))
	((= i new-top))
      (setf (svref *eval-stack* i) nil))
    (setf *eval-stack-top* new-top)))

;;; EVAL-STACK-SHRINK -- Internal.
;;;
;;; The anthesis of EVAL-STACK-EXTEND.
;;;
(defun eval-stack-shrink (n)
  (when *eval-stack-trace*
    (format t "shrinking to ~D.~%" (- *eval-stack-top* n)))
  (decf *eval-stack-top* n))

;;; EVAL-STACK-SET-TOP -- Internal.
;;;
;;; This is used to shrink the stack back to a previous frame pointer.
;;;
(defun eval-stack-set-top (ptr)
  (when *eval-stack-trace* (format t "setting top to ~D.~%" ptr))
  (setf *eval-stack-top* ptr))


;;; EVAL-STACK-LOCAL -- Internal.
;;;
;;; This returns a local variable from the current stack frame.  This is used
;;; for references the compiler represents as a lambda-var leaf.  This is a
;;; macro for SETF purposes.
;;;
(defmacro eval-stack-local (fp offset)
  `(svref *eval-stack* (+ ,fp ,offset)))


;;;; Interpreted functions:

(defvar *interpreted-function-cache-minimum-size* 25
  "If the interpreted function cache has more functions than this come GC time,
  then attempt to prune it according to
  *INTERPRETED-FUNCTION-CACHE-THRESHOLD*.")

(defvar *interpreted-function-cache-threshold* 3
  "If an interpreted function goes uncalled for more than this many GCs, then
  it is eligible for flushing from the cache.")

(declaim (type c::index
	       *interpreted-function-cache-minimum-size*
	       *interpreted-function-cache-threshold*))


;;; The list of INTERPRETED-FUNCTIONS that have translated definitions.
;;;
(defvar *interpreted-function-cache* nil)
(declaim (type list *interpreted-function-cache*))


;;; MAKE-INTERPRETED-FUNCTION  --  Interface
;;;
;;;    Return a function that will lazily convert Lambda when called, and will
;;; cache translations.
;;;
(defun make-interpreted-function (lambda)
  (let ((res (%make-interpreted-function :lambda lambda
					 :arglist (second lambda))))
    (setf (funcallable-instance-function res)
	  #'(instance-lambda (&rest args)
	       (let ((fun (interpreted-function-definition res))
		     (args (cons (length args) args)))
		 (setf (interpreted-function-gcs res) 0)
		 (internal-apply (or fun (convert-interpreted-fun res))
				 args '#()))))
    res))


;;; CONVERT-INTERPRETED-FUN  --  Internal
;;;
;;;    Eval a FUNCTION form, grab the definition and stick it in.
;;;
(defun convert-interpreted-fun (fun)
  (declare (type interpreted-function fun))
  (let* ((new (interpreted-function-definition
	       (internal-eval `#',(interpreted-function-lambda fun)
			      (interpreted-function-converted-once fun)))))
    (setf (interpreted-function-definition fun) new)
    (setf (interpreted-function-converted-once fun) t)
    (let ((name (interpreted-function-%name fun)))
      (setf (c::leaf-name new) name)
      (setf (c::leaf-name (c::main-entry (c::functional-entry-function new)))
	    name))
    (push fun *interpreted-function-cache*)
    new))


;;; INTERPRETED-FUNCTION-LAMDBA-EXPRESSION  --  Interface
;;;
;;;    Get the CLAMBDA for the XEP, then look at the inline expansion info in
;;; the real function.
;;;
(defun interpreted-function-lambda-expression (x)
  (let ((lambda (interpreted-function-lambda x)))
    (if lambda
	(values lambda nil (interpreted-function-%name x))
	(let ((fun (c::functional-entry-function
		    (interpreted-function-definition x))))
	  (values (c::functional-inline-expansion fun)
		  (if (let ((env (c::functional-lexenv fun)))
			(or (c::lexenv-functions env)
			    (c::lexenv-variables env)
			    (c::lexenv-blocks env)
			    (c::lexenv-tags env)))
		      t nil)
		  (or (interpreted-function-%name x)
		      (c::component-name
		       (c::block-component
 			(c::node-block
 			 (c::lambda-bind (c::main-entry fun)))))))))))


;;; INTERPRETED-FUNCTION-TYPE  --  Interface
;;;
;;;    Return a FUNCTION-TYPE describing an eval function.  We just grab the
;;; LEAF-TYPE of the definition, converting the definition if not currently
;;; cached.
;;;
(defvar *already-looking-for-type-of* nil)
;;;
(defun interpreted-function-type (fun)
  (if (member fun *already-looking-for-type-of*)
      (specifier-type 'function)
      (let* ((*already-looking-for-type-of*
	      (cons fun *already-looking-for-type-of*))
	     (def (or (interpreted-function-definition fun)
		      (system:without-gcing
		       (convert-interpreted-fun fun)
		       (interpreted-function-definition fun)))))
	(c::leaf-type (c::functional-entry-function def)))))


;;; 
;;; INTERPRETED-FUNCTION-NAME  --  Interface
;;;
(defun interpreted-function-name (x)
  (multiple-value-bind (ig1 ig2 res)
		       (interpreted-function-lambda-expression x)
    (declare (ignore ig1 ig2))
    res))
;;;
(defun (setf interpreted-function-name) (val x)
  (let ((def (interpreted-function-definition x)))
    (when def
      (setf (c::leaf-name def) val)
      (setf (c::leaf-name (c::main-entry (c::functional-entry-function def)))
	    val))
    (setf (interpreted-function-%name x) val)))

;;; INTERPRETER-GC-HOOK  --  Internal
;;;
;;;    Clear the unused portion of the eval stack, and flush the definitions of
;;; all functions in the cache that haven't been used enough.
;;;
(defun interpreter-gc-hook ()
  (let ((len (length (the simple-vector *eval-stack*))))
    (do ((i *eval-stack-top* (1+ i)))
	((= i len))
      (setf (svref *eval-stack* i) nil)))

  (let ((num (- (length *interpreted-function-cache*)
		*interpreted-function-cache-minimum-size*)))
    (when (plusp num)
      (setq *interpreted-function-cache*
	    (delete-if #'(lambda (x)
			   (when (>= (interpreted-function-gcs x)
				     *interpreted-function-cache-threshold*)
			     (setf (interpreted-function-definition x) nil)
			     t))
		       *interpreted-function-cache*
		       :count num))))

  (dolist (fun *interpreted-function-cache*)
    (incf (interpreted-function-gcs fun))))
;;;
(pushnew 'interpreter-gc-hook ext:*before-gc-hooks*)


;;; FLUSH-INTERPRETED-FUNCTION-CACHE  --  Interface
;;;
(defun flush-interpreted-function-cache ()
  "Clear all entries in the eval function cache.  This allows the internal
  representation of the functions to be reclaimed, and also lazily forces
  macroexpansions to be recomputed."
  (dolist (fun *interpreted-function-cache*)
    (setf (interpreted-function-definition fun) nil))
  (setq *interpreted-function-cache* ()))


;;;; INTERNAL-APPLY-LOOP macros.

;;; These macros are intimately related to INTERNAL-APPLY-LOOP.  They assume
;;; variables established by this function, and they assume they can return
;;; from a block by that name.  This is sleazy, but we justify it as follows:
;;; They are so specialized in use, and their invocation became lengthy, that
;;; we allowed them to slime some access to things in their expanding
;;; environment.  These macros don't really extend our Lisp syntax, but they do
;;; provide some template expansion service; it is these cleaner circumstance
;;; that require a more rigid programming style.
;;;
;;; Since these are macros expanded almost solely for c::combination nodes,
;;; they cascade from the end of this logical page to the beginning here.
;;; Therefore, it is best you start looking at them from the end of this
;;; section, backwards from normal scanning mode for Lisp code.
;;;

;;; DO-COMBINATION -- Internal.
;;;
;;; This runs a function on some arguments from the stack.  If the combination
;;; occurs in a tail recursive position, then we do the call such that we
;;; return from tail-p-function with whatever values the call produces.  With a
;;; :local call, we have to restore the stack to its previous frame before
;;; doing the call.  The :full call mechanism does this for us.  If it is NOT a
;;; tail recursive call, and we're in a multiple value context, then then push
;;; a list of the returned values.  Do the same thing if we're in a :return
;;; context.  Push a single value, without listifying it, for a :single value
;;; context.  Otherwise, just call for side effect.
;;;
;;; Node is the combination node, and cont is its continuation.  Frame-ptr
;;; is the current frame pointer, and closure is the current environment for
;;; closure variables.  Call-type is either :full or :local, and when it is
;;; local, lambda is the IR1 lambda to apply.
;;;
;;; This assumes the following variables are present: node, cont, frame-ptr,
;;; and closure.  It also assumes a block named internal-apply-loop.
;;;
(defmacro do-combination (call-type lambda mv-or-normal)
  (let* ((args (gensym))
	 (calling-closure (gensym))
	 (invoke-fun (ecase mv-or-normal
		       (:mv-call 'mv-internal-invoke)
		       (:normal 'internal-invoke)))
	 (args-form (ecase mv-or-normal
		      (:mv-call
		       `(mv-eval-stack-args
			 (length (c::mv-combination-args node))))
		      (:normal
		       `(eval-stack-args (c:lambda-eval-info-args-passed
					  (c::lambda-info ,lambda))))))
	 (call-form (ecase call-type
		      (:full `(,invoke-fun
			       (length (c::basic-combination-args node))))
		      (:local `(internal-apply
				,lambda ,args-form
				(compute-closure node ,lambda frame-ptr
						 closure)
				nil))))
	 (tailp-call-form
	  (ecase call-type
	    (:full `(return-from
		     internal-apply-loop
		     ;; INVOKE-FUN takes care of the stack itself.
		     (,invoke-fun (length (c::basic-combination-args node))
				  frame-ptr)))
	    (:local `(let ((,args ,args-form)
			   (,calling-closure
			    (compute-closure node ,lambda frame-ptr closure)))
		       ;; No need to clean up stack slots for GC due to
		       ;; ext:*before-gc-hook*.
		       (eval-stack-set-top frame-ptr)
		       (return-from
			internal-apply-loop 
			(internal-apply ,lambda ,args ,calling-closure
					nil)))))))
    `(cond ((c::node-tail-p node)
	    ,tailp-call-form)
	   (t
	    (ecase (c::continuation-info cont)
	      ((:multiple :return)
	       (eval-stack-push (multiple-value-list ,call-form)))
	      (:single
	       (eval-stack-push ,call-form))
	      (:unused ,call-form))))))

;;; SET-BLOCK -- Internal.
;;;
;;; This sets the variable block in INTERNAL-APPLY-LOOP, and it announces this
;;; by setting set-block-p for later loop iteration maintenance.
;;;
(defmacro set-block (exp)
  `(progn
     (setf block ,exp)
     (setf set-block-p t)))

;;; CHANGE-BLOCKS -- Internal.
;;;
;;; This sets all the iteration variables in INTERNAL-APPLY-LOOP to iterate
;;; over a new block's nodes.  Block-exp is optional because sometimes we have
;;; already set block, and we only need to bring the others into agreement.
;;; If we already set block, then clear the variable that announces this,
;;; set-block-p.
;;;
(defmacro change-blocks (&optional block-exp)
  `(progn
     ,(if block-exp
	  `(setf block ,block-exp)
	  `(setf set-block-p nil))
     (setf node (c::continuation-next (c::block-start block)))
     (setf last-cont (c::node-cont (c::block-last block)))))


;;; This controls printing visited nodes in INTERNAL-APPLY-LOOP.  We use it
;;; here, and INTERNAL-INVOKE uses it to print function call looking output
;;; to further describe c::combination nodes.
;;;
(defvar *internal-apply-node-trace* nil)
;;;
(defun maybe-trace-funny-fun (node name &rest args)
  (when *internal-apply-node-trace*
    (format t "(~S ~{ ~S~})  c~S~%"
	    name args (c::cont-num (c::node-cont node)))))


;;; DO-FUNNY-FUNCTION -- Internal.
;;;
;;; This implements the intention of the virtual function name.  This is a
;;; macro because some of these actions must occur without a function call.
;;; For example, calling a dispatch function to implement special binding would
;;; be a no-op because returning from that function would cause the system to
;;; undo any special bindings it established.
;;;
;;; NOTE: update C:ANNOTATE-COMPONENT-FOR-EVAL and/or c::undefined-funny-funs
;;; if you add or remove branches in this routine.
;;;
;;; This assumes the following variables are present: node, cont, frame-ptr,
;;; args, closure, block, and last-cont.  It also assumes a block named
;;; internal-apply-loop.
;;;
(defmacro do-funny-function (funny-fun-name)
  (let ((name (gensym)))
    `(let ((,name ,funny-fun-name))
       (ecase ,name
	 (c::%special-bind
	  (let ((value (eval-stack-pop))
		(global-var (eval-stack-pop)))
	    (maybe-trace-funny-fun node ,name global-var value)
	    (system:%primitive bind value (c::global-var-name global-var))))
	 (c::%special-unbind
	  ;; Throw away arg telling me which special, and tell the dynamic
	  ;; binding mechanism to unbind one variable.
	  (eval-stack-pop)
	  (maybe-trace-funny-fun node ,name)
	  (system:%primitive unbind))
	 (c::%catch
	  (let* ((tag (eval-stack-pop))
		 (nlx-info (eval-stack-pop))
		 (fell-through-p nil)
		 ;; Ultimately THROW and CATCH will fix the interpreter's stack
		 ;; since this is necessary for compiled CATCH's and those in
		 ;; the initial top level function.
		 (stack-top *eval-stack-top*)
		 (values
		  (multiple-value-list
		   (catch tag
		     (maybe-trace-funny-fun node ,name tag)
		     (multiple-value-setq (block node cont last-cont)
		       (internal-apply-loop (c::continuation-next cont)
					    frame-ptr lambda args closure))
		     (setf fell-through-p t)))))
	    (cond (fell-through-p
		   ;; We got here because we just saw the C::%CATCH-BREAKUP
		   ;; funny function inside the above recursive call to
		   ;; INTERNAL-APPLY-LOOP.  Therefore, we just received and
		   ;; stored the current state of evaluation for falling
		   ;; through.
		   )
		  (t
		   ;; Fix up the interpreter's stack after having thrown here.
		   ;; We won't need to do this in the final implementation.
		   (eval-stack-set-top stack-top)
		   ;; Take the values received in the list bound above, and
		   ;; massage them into the form expected by the continuation
		   ;; of the non-local-exit info.
		   (ecase (c::continuation-info
			   (c::nlx-info-continuation nlx-info))
		     (:single
		      (eval-stack-push (car values)))
		     ((:multiple :return)
		      (eval-stack-push values))
		     (:unused))
		   ;; We want to continue with the code after the CATCH body.
		   ;; The non-local-exit info tells us where this is, but we
		   ;; know that block only contains a call to the funny
		   ;; function C::%NLX-ENTRY, which simply is a place holder
		   ;; for the compiler IR1.  We want to skip the target block
		   ;; entirely, so we say it is the block we're in now and say
		   ;; the current cont is the last-cont.  This makes the COND
		   ;; at the end of INTERNAL-APPLY-LOOP do the right thing.
		   (setf block (c::nlx-info-target nlx-info))
		   (setf cont last-cont)))))
	 (c::%unwind-protect
	  ;; Cleanup function not pushed due to special-case :UNUSED
	  ;; annotation in ANNOTATE-COMPONENT-FOR-EVAL.
	  (let* ((nlx-info (eval-stack-pop))
		 (fell-through-p nil)
		 (stack-top *eval-stack-top*))
	    (unwind-protect
		(progn
		  (maybe-trace-funny-fun node ,name)
		  (multiple-value-setq (block node cont last-cont)
		    (internal-apply-loop (c::continuation-next cont)
					 frame-ptr lambda args closure))
		  (setf fell-through-p t))
	      (cond (fell-through-p
		     ;; We got here because we just saw the
		     ;; C::%UNWIND-PROTECT-BREAKUP funny function inside the
		     ;; above recursive call to INTERNAL-APPLY-LOOP.
		     ;; Therefore, we just received and stored the current
		     ;; state of evaluation for falling through.
		     )
		    (t
		     ;; Fix up the interpreter's stack after having thrown here.
		     ;; We won't need to do this in the final implementation.
		     (eval-stack-set-top stack-top)
		     ;;
		     ;; Push some bogus values for exit context to keep the
		     ;; MV-BIND in the UNWIND-PROTECT translation happy. 
		     (eval-stack-push '(nil nil 0))
		     (let ((node (c::continuation-next
				  (c::block-start
				   (car (c::block-succ
					 (c::nlx-info-target nlx-info)))))))
		       (internal-apply-loop node frame-ptr lambda args
					    closure)))))))
	 ((c::%catch-breakup c::%unwind-protect-breakup c::%continue-unwind)
	  ;; This shows up when we locally exit a CATCH body -- fell through.
	  ;; Return the current state of evaluation to the previous invocation
	  ;; of INTERNAL-APPLY-LOOP which happens to be running in the
	  ;; c::%catch branch of this code.
	  (maybe-trace-funny-fun node ,name)
	  (return-from internal-apply-loop
		       (values block node cont last-cont)))
	 (c::%nlx-entry
	  (maybe-trace-funny-fun node ,name)
	  ;; This just marks a spot in the code for CATCH, UNWIND-PROTECT, and
	  ;; non-local lexical exits (GO or RETURN-FROM).
	  ;; Do nothing since c::%catch does it all when it catches a THROW.
	  ;; Do nothing since c::%unwind-protect does it all when
	  ;; it catches a THROW.
	  )
	 (c::%more-arg-context
	  (let* ((fixed-arg-count (1+ (eval-stack-pop)))
		 ;; Add 1 to actual fixed count for extra arg expected by
		 ;; external entry points (XEP) which some IR1 lambdas have.
		 ;; The extra arg is the number of arguments for arg count
		 ;; consistency checking.  C::%MORE-ARG-CONTEXT always runs
		 ;; within an XEP, so the lambda has an extra arg.
		 (more-args (nthcdr fixed-arg-count args)))
	    (maybe-trace-funny-fun node ,name fixed-arg-count)
	    (assert (eq (c::continuation-info cont) :multiple))
	    (eval-stack-push (list more-args (length more-args)))))
	 (c::%unknown-values
	  (error "C::%UNKNOWN-VALUES should never be in interpreter's IR1."))
	 (c::%lexical-exit-breakup
	  ;; We see this whenever we locally exit the extent of a lexical
	  ;; target.  That is, we are truly locally exiting an extent we could
	  ;; have non-locally lexically exited.  Return the :fell-through flag
	  ;; and the current state of evaluation to the previous invocation
	  ;; of INTERNAL-APPLY-LOOP which happens to be running in the
	  ;; c::entry branch of INTERNAL-APPLY-LOOP.
	  (maybe-trace-funny-fun node ,name)
	  ;;
	  ;; Discard the NLX-INFO arg...
	  (eval-stack-pop)
	  (return-from internal-apply-loop
		       (values :fell-through block node cont last-cont)))))))


;;; COMBINATION-NODE -- Internal.
;;;
;;; This expands for the two types of combination nodes INTERNAL-APPLY-LOOP
;;; sees.  Type is either :mv-call or :normal.  Node is the combination node,
;;; and cont is its continuation.  Frame-ptr is the current frame pointer, and
;;; closure is the current environment for closure variables.
;;;
;;; Most of the real work is done by DO-COMBINATION.  This first determines if
;;; the combination node describes a :full call which DO-COMBINATION directly
;;; handles.  If the call is :local, then we either invoke an IR1 lambda, or we
;;; just bind some LET variables.  If the call is :local, and type is :mv-call,
;;; then we can only be binding multiple values.  Otherwise, the combination
;;; node describes a function known to the compiler, but this may be a funny
;;; function that actually isn't ever defined.  We either take some action for
;;; the funny function or do a :full call on the known true function, but the
;;; interpreter doesn't do optimizing stuff for functions known to the
;;; compiler.
;;;
;;; This assumes the following variables are present: node, cont, frame-ptr,
;;; and closure.  It also assumes a block named internal-apply-loop.
;;;
(defmacro combination-node (type)
  (let* ((kind (gensym))
	 (fun (gensym))
	 (lambda (gensym))
	 (letp (gensym))
	 (letp-bind (ecase type
		      (:mv-call nil)
		      (:normal
		       `((,letp (eq (c::functional-kind ,lambda) :let))))))
	 (local-branch
	  (ecase type
	    (:mv-call
	     `(store-mv-let-vars ,lambda frame-ptr
				 (length (c::mv-combination-args node))))
	    (:normal
	     `(if ,letp
		  (store-let-vars ,lambda frame-ptr)
		  (do-combination :local ,lambda ,type))))))
    `(let ((,kind (c::basic-combination-kind node))
	   (,fun (c::basic-combination-fun node)))
       (cond ((member ,kind '(:full :error))
	      (do-combination :full nil ,type))
	     ((eq ,kind :local)
	      (let* ((,lambda (c::ref-leaf (c::continuation-use ,fun)))
		     ,@letp-bind)
		,local-branch))
	     ((eq (c::continuation-info ,fun) :unused)
	      (assert (typep ,kind 'c::function-info))
	      (do-funny-function (c::continuation-function-name ,fun)))
	     (t
	      (assert (typep ,kind 'c::function-info))
	      (do-combination :full nil ,type))))))


(defun trace-eval (on)
  (setf *eval-stack-trace* on)
  (setf *internal-apply-node-trace* on))


;;; INTERNAL-EVAL  --  Interface
;;;
;;;    Evaluate an arbitary form.  We convert the form, then call internal
;;; apply on it.
;;;
(defun internal-eval (form &optional quietly env)
  (let ((res (c:compile-for-eval form quietly env)))
    (internal-apply res nil '#())))


;;; VALUE -- Internal.
;;;
;;; This passes on a node's value appropriately, possibly returning from
;;; function to do so.  When we are tail-p, don't push the value, return it on
;;; the system's actual call stack; when we blow out of function this way, we
;;; must return the interpreter's stack to the its state before this call to
;;; function.  When we're in a multiple value context or heading for a return
;;; node, we push a list of the value for easier handling later.  Otherwise,
;;; just push the value on the interpreter's stack.
;;;
(defmacro value (node info value frame-ptr function)
  `(cond ((c::node-tail-p ,node)
	  (eval-stack-set-top ,frame-ptr)
	  (return-from ,function ,value))
	 ((member ,info '(:multiple :return) :test #'eq)
	  (eval-stack-push (list ,value)))
	 (t (assert (eq ,info :single))
	    (eval-stack-push ,value))))


(defun maybe-trace-nodes (node)
  (when *internal-apply-node-trace*
    (format t "<~A-node> c~S~%"
	    (type-of node)
	    (c::cont-num (c::node-cont node)))))

;;; INTERNAL-APPLY -- Internal.
;;;
;;; This interprets lambda, a compiler IR1 data structure representing a
;;; function, applying it to args.  Closure is the environment in which to run
;;; lambda, the variables and such closed over to form lambda.  The call occurs
;;; on the interpreter's stack, so save the current top and extend the stack
;;; for this lambda's call frame.  Then store the args into locals on the
;;; stack.
;;;
;;; Args is the list of arguments to apply to.  If IGNORE-UNUSED is true, then
;;; values for un-read variables are present in the argument list, and must be
;;; discarded (always true except in a local call.)  Args may run out of values
;;; before vars runs out of variables (in the case of an XEP with optionals);
;;; we just do CAR of nil and store nil.  This is not the proper defaulting
;;; (which is done by explicit code in the XEP.)
;;;
(defun internal-apply (lambda args closure &optional (ignore-unused t))
  (let ((frame-ptr *eval-stack-top*))
    (eval-stack-extend (c:lambda-eval-info-frame-size (c::lambda-info lambda)))
    (do ((vars (c::lambda-vars lambda) (cdr vars))
	 (args args))
	((null vars))
      (let ((var (car vars)))
	(cond ((c::leaf-refs var)
	       (setf (eval-stack-local frame-ptr (c::lambda-var-info var))
		     (if (c::lambda-var-indirect var)
			 (c:make-value-cell (pop args))
			 (pop args))))
	      (ignore-unused (pop args)))))
    (internal-apply-loop (c::lambda-bind lambda) frame-ptr lambda args
			 closure)))

;;; INTERNAL-APPLY-LOOP -- Internal.
;;;
;;; This does the work of INTERNAL-APPLY.  This also calls itself recursively
;;; for certain language features, such as CATCH.  First is the node at which
;;; to start interpreting.  Frame-ptr is the current frame pointer for
;;; accessing local variables.  Lambda is the IR1 lambda from which comes the
;;; nodes a given call to this function processes, and closure is the
;;; environment for interpreting lambda.  Args is the argument list for the
;;; lambda given to INTERNAL-APPLY, and we have to carry it around with us
;;; in case of more-arg or rest-arg processing which is represented explicitly
;;; in the compiler's IR1.
;;;
;;; Due to having a truly tail recursive interpreter, some of the branches
;;; handling a given node need to RETURN-FROM this routine.  Also, some calls
;;; this makes to do work for it must occur in tail recursive positions.
;;; Because of this required access to this function lexical environment and
;;; calling positions, we often are unable to break off logical chunks of code
;;; into functions.  We have written macros intended solely for use in this
;;; routine, and due to all the local stuff they need to access and length
;;; complex calls, we have written them to sleazily access locals from this
;;; routine.  In addition to assuming a block named internal-apply-loop exists,
;;; they set and reference the following variables: node, cont, frame-ptr,
;;; closure, block, last-cont, and set-block-p.
;;;
(defun internal-apply-loop (first frame-ptr lambda args closure)
  (declare (optimize (debug 2)))
  (let* ((block (c::node-block first))
	 (last-cont (c::node-cont (c::block-last block)))
	 (node first)
	 (set-block-p nil))
      (loop
	(let ((cont (c::node-cont node)))
	  (etypecase node
	    (c::ref
	     (maybe-trace-nodes node)
	     (let ((info (c::continuation-info cont)))
	       (unless (eq info :unused)
		 (value node info (leaf-value node frame-ptr closure)
			frame-ptr internal-apply-loop))))
	    (c::combination
	     (maybe-trace-nodes node)
	     (combination-node :normal))
	    (c::cif
	     (maybe-trace-nodes node)
	     ;; IF nodes always occur at the end of a block, so pick another.
	     (set-block (if (eval-stack-pop)
			    (c::if-consequent node)
			    (c::if-alternative node))))
	    (c::bind
	     (maybe-trace-nodes node)
	     ;; Ignore bind nodes since INTERNAL-APPLY extends the stack for
	     ;; all of a lambda's locals, and the c::combination branch
	     ;; handles LET binds (moving values off stack top into locals).
	     )
	    (c::cset
	     (maybe-trace-nodes node)
	     (let ((info (c::continuation-info cont))
		   (res (set-leaf-value node frame-ptr closure
					(eval-stack-pop))))
	       (unless (eq info :unused)
		 (value node info res frame-ptr internal-apply-loop))))
	    (c::entry
	     (maybe-trace-nodes node)
	     (let ((info (cdr (assoc node (c:lambda-eval-info-entries
					   (c::lambda-info lambda))))))
	       ;; No info means no-op entry for CATCH or UNWIND-PROTECT.
	       (when info
		 ;; Store stack top for restoration in local exit situation
		 ;; in c::exit branch.
		 (setf (eval-stack-local frame-ptr
					 (c:entry-node-info-st-top info))
		       *eval-stack-top*)
		 (let ((tag (c:entry-node-info-nlx-tag info)))
		   (when tag
		     ;; Non-local lexical exit (someone closed over a
		     ;; GO tag or BLOCK name).
		     (let ((unique-tag (cons nil nil))
			   values)
		       (setf (eval-stack-local frame-ptr tag) unique-tag)
		       (if (eq cont last-cont)
			   (change-blocks (car (c::block-succ block)))
			   (setf node (c::continuation-next cont)))
		       (loop
			 (multiple-value-setq (values block node cont last-cont)
			   (catch unique-tag
			     (internal-apply-loop node frame-ptr
						  lambda args closure)))
			 
			 (when (eq values :fell-through)
			   ;; We hit a %LEXICAL-EXIT-BREAKUP.
			   ;; Interpreting state is set with MV-SETQ above.
			   ;; Just get out of this branch and go on.
			   (return))
			 
			 (unless (eq values :non-local-go)
			   ;; We know we're non-locally exiting from a
			   ;; BLOCK with values (saw a RETURN-FROM).
			   (ecase (c::continuation-info cont)
			     (:single
			      (eval-stack-push (car values)))
			     ((:multiple :return)
			      (eval-stack-push values))
			     (:unused)))
			 ;;
			 ;; Start interpreting again at the target, skipping
			 ;; the %NLX-ENTRY block.
			 (setf node
			       (c::continuation-next
				(c::block-start
				 (car (c::block-succ block))))))))))))
	    (c::exit
	     (maybe-trace-nodes node)
	     (let* ((incoming-values (c::exit-value node))
		    (values (if incoming-values (eval-stack-pop))))
	       (cond
		((eq (c::lambda-environment lambda)
		     (c::block-environment
		      (c::node-block (c::exit-entry node))))
		 ;; Local exit.
		 ;; Fixup stack top and massage values for destination.
		 (eval-stack-set-top
		  (eval-stack-local frame-ptr
				    (c:entry-node-info-st-top
				     (cdr (assoc (c::exit-entry node)
						 (c:lambda-eval-info-entries
						  (c::lambda-info lambda)))))))
		 (ecase (c::continuation-info cont)
		   (:single
		    (assert incoming-values)
		    (eval-stack-push (car values)))
		   ((:multiple :return)
		    (assert incoming-values)
		    (eval-stack-push values))
		   (:unused)))
		(t
		 (let ((info (c::find-nlx-info (c::exit-entry node) cont)))
		   (throw
		    (svref closure
			   (position info
				     (c::environment-closure
				      (c::node-environment node))
				     :test #'eq))
		    (if incoming-values
			(values values (c::nlx-info-target info) nil cont)
			(values :non-local-go (c::nlx-info-target info)))))))))
	    (c::creturn
	     (maybe-trace-nodes node)
	     (let ((values (eval-stack-pop)))
	       (eval-stack-set-top frame-ptr)
	       (return-from internal-apply-loop (values-list values))))
	    (c::mv-combination
	     (maybe-trace-nodes node)
	     (combination-node :mv-call)))
	  ;; See function doc below.
	  (reference-this-var-to-keep-it-alive node)
	  (reference-this-var-to-keep-it-alive frame-ptr)
	  (reference-this-var-to-keep-it-alive closure)
	  (cond ((not (eq cont last-cont))
		 (setf node (c::continuation-next cont)))
		;; Currently only the last node in a block causes this loop to
		;; change blocks, so we never just go to the next node when
		;; the current node's branch tried to change blocks.
		(set-block-p
		 (change-blocks))
		(t
		 ;; Cif nodes set the block for us, but other last nodes do not.
		 (change-blocks (car (c::block-succ block)))))))))

;;; REFERENCE-THIS-VAR-TO-KEEP-IT-ALIVE -- Internal.
;;;
;;; This function allows a reference to a variable that the compiler cannot
;;; easily eliminate as unnecessary.  We use this at the end of the node
;;; dispatch in INTERNAL-APPLY-LOOP to make sure the node variable has a
;;; valid value.  Each node branch tends to reference it at the beginning,
;;; and then there is no reference but a set at the end; the compiler then
;;; kills the variable between the reference in the dispatch branch and when
;;; we set it at the end.  The problem is that most error will occur in the
;;; interpreter within one of these node dispatch branches.
;;;
(defun reference-this-var-to-keep-it-alive (node)
  node)


;;; SET-LEAF-VALUE -- Internal.
;;;
;;; This sets a c::cset node's var to value, returning value.  When var is
;;; local, we have to compare its home environment to the current one, node's
;;; environment.  If they're the same, we check to see if the var is indirect,
;;; and store the value on the stack or in the value cell as appropriate.
;;; Otherwise, var is a closure variable, and since we're setting it, we know
;;; it's location contains an indirect value object.
;;;
(defun set-leaf-value (node frame-ptr closure value)
  (let ((var (c::set-var node)))
    (etypecase var
      (c::lambda-var
       (set-leaf-value-lambda-var node var frame-ptr closure value))
      (c::global-var
       (setf (symbol-value (c::global-var-name var)) value)))))

;;; SET-LEAF-VALUE-LAMBDA-VAR -- Internal Interface.
;;;
;;; This does SET-LEAF-VALUE for a lambda-var leaf.  The debugger tools'
;;; internals uses this also to set interpreted local variables. If the var
;;; is a lexical variable with no refs, then we don't actually set anything,
;;; since the variable has been deleted.
;;;
(defun set-leaf-value-lambda-var (node var frame-ptr closure value)
  (when (c::leaf-refs var)
    (let ((env (c::node-environment node)))
      (cond ((not (eq (c::lambda-environment (c::lambda-var-home var))
		      env))
	     (c:value-cell-set
	      (svref closure (position var (c::environment-closure env)
				       :test #'eq))
	      value))
	    ((c::lambda-var-indirect var)
	     (c:value-cell-set
	      (eval-stack-local frame-ptr (c::lambda-var-info var))
	      value))
	    (t
	     (setf (eval-stack-local frame-ptr (c::lambda-var-info var))
		   value)))))
  value)

;;; LEAF-VALUE -- Internal.
;;;
;;; This figures out how to return a value for a ref node.  Leaf is the ref's
;;; structure that tells us about the value, and it is one of the following
;;; types:
;;;    constant   -- It knows its own value.
;;;    global-var -- It's either a value or function reference.  Get it right.
;;;    local-var  -- This may on the stack or in the current closure, the
;;; 		     environment for the lambda INTERNAL-APPLY is currently
;;;		     executing.  If the leaf's home environment is the same
;;;		     as the node's home environment, then the value is on the
;;;		     stack, else it's in the closure since it came from another
;;;		     environment.  Whether the var comes from the stack or the
;;;		     closure, it could have come from a closure, and it could
;;;		     have been closed over for setting.  When this happens, the
;;;		     actual value is stored in an indirection object, so
;;;		     indirect.  See COMPUTE-CLOSURE for the description of
;;;		     the structure of the closure argument to this function.
;;;    functional -- This is a reference to an interpreted function that may
;;;		     be passed or called anywhere.  We return a real function
;;;		     that calls INTERNAL-APPLY, closing over the leaf.  We also
;;;		     have to compute a closure, running environment, for the
;;;		     lambda in case it references stuff in the current
;;;		     environment.  If the closure is empty and there is no
;;;                  functional environment, then we use
;;;                  MAKE-INTERPRETED-FUNCTION to make a cached translation.
;;;                  Since it is too late to lazily convert, we set up the
;;;                  INTERPRETED-FUNCTION to be already converted. 
;;;
(defun leaf-value (node frame-ptr closure)
  (let ((leaf (c::ref-leaf node)))
    (etypecase leaf
      (c::constant
       (c::constant-value leaf))
      (c::global-var
       (locally (declare (optimize (safety 1)))
	 (if (eq (c::global-var-kind leaf) :global-function)
	     (let ((name (c::global-var-name leaf)))
	       (if (symbolp name)
		   (symbol-function name)
		   (fdefinition name)))
	     (symbol-value (c::global-var-name leaf)))))
      (c::lambda-var
       (leaf-value-lambda-var node leaf frame-ptr closure))
      (c::functional
       (let* ((calling-closure (compute-closure node leaf frame-ptr closure))
	      (real-fun (c::functional-entry-function leaf))
	      (arg-doc (c::functional-arg-documentation real-fun)))
	 (cond ((c:lambda-eval-info-function (c::leaf-info leaf)))
	       ((and (zerop (length calling-closure))
		     (null (c::lexenv-functions
			    (c::functional-lexenv real-fun))))
		(let ((res (make-interpreted-function
			    (c::functional-inline-expansion real-fun))))
		  (push res *interpreted-function-cache*)
		  (setf (interpreted-function-definition res) leaf)
		  (setf (interpreted-function-converted-once res) t)
		  (setf (interpreted-function-arglist res) arg-doc)
		  (setf (interpreted-function-%name res)
			(c::leaf-name real-fun))
		  (setf (c:lambda-eval-info-function (c::leaf-info leaf)) res)
		  res))
	       (t
		(let ((res (%make-interpreted-function
			    :definition leaf
			    :%name (c::leaf-name real-fun)
			    :arglist arg-doc
			    :closure calling-closure)))
		  (setf (funcallable-instance-function res)
			#'(instance-lambda (&rest args)
		            (declare (list args))
			    (internal-apply
			     (interpreted-function-definition res)
			     (cons (length args) args)
			     (interpreted-function-closure res))))
		  res))))))))

;;; LEAF-VALUE-LAMBDA-VAR -- Internal Interface.
;;;
;;; This does LEAF-VALUE for a lambda-var leaf.  The debugger tools' internals
;;; uses this also to reference interpreted local variables.
;;;
(defun leaf-value-lambda-var (node leaf frame-ptr closure)
  (let* ((env (c::node-environment node))
	 (temp
	  (if (eq (c::lambda-environment (c::lambda-var-home leaf))
		  env)
	      (eval-stack-local frame-ptr (c::lambda-var-info leaf))
	      (svref closure
		     (position leaf (c::environment-closure env)
			       :test #'eq)))))
    (if (c::lambda-var-indirect leaf)
	(c:value-cell-ref temp)
	temp)))

;;; COMPUTE-CLOSURE -- Internal.
;;;
;;; This computes a closure for a local call and for returned call'able closure
;;; objects.  Sometimes the closure is a simple-vector of no elements.  Node
;;; is either a reference node or a combination node.  Leaf is either the leaf
;;; of the reference node or the lambda to internally apply for the combination
;;; node.  Frame-ptr is the current frame pointer for fetching current values
;;; to store in the closure.  Closure is the current closure, the currently
;;; interpreting lambda's closed over environment.
;;;
;;; A computed closure is a vector corresponding to the list of closure
;;; variables described in an environment.  The position of a lambda-var in
;;; this closure list is the index into the closure vector of values.
;;;
;;; Functional-env is the environment description for leaf, the lambda for which
;;; we're computing a closure.  This environment describes which of lambda's
;;; vars we find in lambda's closure when it's running, versus finding them
;;; on the stack.  For each lambda-var in the functional environment's closure
;;; list, if the lambda-var's home environment is the current environment, then
;;; get a value off the stack and store it in the closure we're computing.
;;; Otherwise that lambda-var's value comes from somewhere else, but we have it
;;; in our current closure, the environment we're running in as we compute this
;;; new closure.  Find this value the same way we do in LEAF-VALUE, by finding
;;; the lambda-var's position in the current environment's description of the
;;; current closure.
;;;
(defun compute-closure (node leaf frame-ptr closure)
  (let* ((current-env (c::node-environment node))
	 (current-closure-vars (c::environment-closure current-env))
	 (functional-env (c::lambda-environment leaf))
	 (functional-closure-vars (c::environment-closure functional-env))
	 (functional-closure (make-array (length functional-closure-vars))))
    (do ((vars functional-closure-vars (cdr vars))
	 (i 0 (1+ i)))
	((null vars))
      (let ((ele (car vars)))
	(setf (svref functional-closure i)
	      (etypecase ele
		(c::lambda-var
		 (if (eq (c::lambda-environment (c::lambda-var-home ele))
			 current-env)
		     (eval-stack-local frame-ptr (c::lambda-var-info ele))
		     (svref closure
			    (position ele current-closure-vars
				      :test #'eq))))
		(c::nlx-info
		 (if (eq (c::block-environment (c::nlx-info-target ele))
			 current-env)
		     (eval-stack-local
		      frame-ptr
		      (c:entry-node-info-nlx-tag
		       (cdr (assoc ;; entry node for non-local extent
			     (c::cleanup-mess-up (c::nlx-info-cleanup ele))
			     (c::lambda-eval-info-entries
			      (c::lambda-info
			       ;; lambda INTERNAL-APPLY-LOOP tosses around.
			       (c::environment-function
				(c::node-environment node))))))))
		     (svref closure
			    (position ele current-closure-vars
				      :test #'eq))))))))
    functional-closure))

;;; INTERNAL-INVOKE -- Internal.
;;;
;;; INTERNAL-APPLY uses this to invoke a function from the interpreter's stack
;;; on some arguments also taken from the stack.  When tail-p is non-nil,
;;; control does not return to INTERNAL-APPLY to further interpret the current
;;; IR1 lambda, so INTERNAL-INVOKE must clean up the current interpreter's
;;; stack frame.
;;;
(defun internal-invoke (arg-count &optional tailp)
  (let ((args (eval-stack-args arg-count)) ;LET says this init form runs first.
	(fun (eval-stack-pop)))
    (when tailp (eval-stack-set-top tailp))
    (when *internal-apply-node-trace*
      (format t "(~S~{ ~S~})~%" fun args))
    (apply fun args)))

;;; MV-INTERNAL-INVOKE -- Internal.
;;;
;;; Almost just like INTERNAL-INVOKE.  We call MV-EVAL-STACK-ARGS, and our
;;; function is in a list on the stack instead of simply on the stack.
;;;
(defun mv-internal-invoke (arg-count &optional tailp)
  (let ((args (mv-eval-stack-args arg-count)) ;LET runs this init form first.
	(fun (car (eval-stack-pop))))
    (when tailp (eval-stack-set-top tailp))
    (when *internal-apply-node-trace*
      (format t "(~S~{ ~S~})~%" fun args))
    (apply fun args)))


;;; EVAL-STACK-ARGS -- Internal.
;;;
;;; This returns a list of the top arg-count elements on the interpreter's
;;; stack.  This removes them from the stack.
;;;
(defun eval-stack-args (arg-count)
  (let ((args nil))
    (dotimes (i arg-count args)
      (push (eval-stack-pop) args))))

;;; MV-EVAL-STACK-ARGS -- Internal.
;;;
;;; This assumes the top count elements on interpreter's stack are lists.  This
;;; returns a single list with all the elements from these lists.
;;;
(defun mv-eval-stack-args (count)
  (if (= count 1)
      (eval-stack-pop)
      (let ((last (eval-stack-pop)))
	(dotimes (i (1- count))
	  (let ((next (eval-stack-pop)))
	    (setf last
		  (if next (nconc next last) last))))
	last)))

;;; STORE-LET-VARS -- Internal.
;;;
;;; This stores lambda's vars, stack locals, from values popped off the stack.
;;; When a var has no references, the compiler computes IR1 such that the
;;; continuation delivering the value for the unreference var appears unused.
;;; Because of this, the interpreter drops the value on the floor instead of
;;; saving it on the stack for binding, so we only pop a value when the var has
;;; some reference.  INTERNAL-APPLY uses this for c::combination nodes
;;; representing LET's.
;;;
;;; When storing the local, if it is indirect, then someone closes over it for
;;; setting instead of just for referencing.  We then store an indirection cell
;;; with the value, and the referencing code for locals knows how to get the
;;; actual value.
;;;
(defun store-let-vars (lambda frame-ptr)
  (let* ((vars (c::lambda-vars lambda))
	 (args (eval-stack-args (count-if #'c::leaf-refs vars))))
    (declare (list vars args))
    (dolist (v vars)
      (when (c::leaf-refs v)
	(setf (eval-stack-local frame-ptr (c::lambda-var-info v))
	      (if (c::lambda-var-indirect v)
		  (c:make-value-cell (pop args))
		  (pop args)))))))

;;; STORE-MV-LET-VARS -- Internal.
;;;
;;; This is similar to STORE-LET-VARS, but the values for the locals appear on
;;; the stack in a list due to forms that delivered multiple values to this
;;; lambda/let.  Unlike STORE-LET-VARS, there is no control over the delivery
;;; of a value for an unreferenced var, so we drop the corresponding value on
;;; the floor when no one references it.  INTERNAL-APPLY uses this for
;;; c::mv-combination nodes representing LET's.
;;;
(defun store-mv-let-vars (lambda frame-ptr count)
  (assert (= count 1))
  (let ((args (eval-stack-pop)))
    (dolist (v (c::lambda-vars lambda))
      (if (c::leaf-refs v)
	  (setf (eval-stack-local frame-ptr (c::lambda-var-info v))
		(if (c::lambda-var-indirect v)
		    (c:make-value-cell (pop args))
		    (pop args)))
	  (pop args)))))

#|
;;; STORE-MV-LET-VARS -- Internal.
;;;
;;; This stores lambda's vars, stack locals, from multiple values stored on the
;;; top of the stack in a list.  Since these values arrived multiply, there is
;;; no control over the delivery of each value for an unreferenced var, so
;;; unlike STORE-LET-VARS, we have values for variables never used.  We drop
;;; the value corresponding to an unreferenced var on the floor.
;;; INTERNAL-APPLY uses this for c::mv-combination nodes representing LET's.
;;;
;;; IR1 represents variables bound from multiple values in a list in the
;;; opposite order of the values list.  We use STORE-MV-LET-VARS-AUX to recurse
;;; down the vars list until we bottom out, storing values on the way back up
;;; the recursion.  You must do this instead of NREVERSE'ing the args list, so
;;; when we run out of values, we store nil's in the correct lambda-vars.
;;;
(defun store-mv-let-vars (lambda frame-ptr count)
  (assert (= count 1))
  (print  (c::lambda-vars lambda))
  (store-mv-let-vars-aux frame-ptr (c::lambda-vars lambda) (eval-stack-pop)))
;;;
(defun store-mv-let-vars-aux (frame-ptr vars args)
  (if vars
      (let ((remaining-args (store-mv-let-vars-aux frame-ptr (cdr vars) args))
	    (v (car vars)))
	(when (c::leaf-refs v)
	  (setf (eval-stack-local frame-ptr (c::lambda-var-info v))
		(if (c::lambda-var-indirect v)
		    (c:make-value-cell (car remaining-args))
		    (car remaining-args))))
	(cdr remaining-args))
      args))
|#
